Coercive Control Law Proposal
Coercive Control is Damaging Emotional Abuse; It Should Be Illegal
by Virginia Jones
See my blog at compassionategathering.blogspot.com
Contact me at compassion500@gmail.com
10/22/25
Virginia’s story and why we need laws outlawing coercive control emotional abuse:
This document contains two parts. First is the story of what happened in my family. The second part is about the legal remedies my son and I have come up with based on other coercive control law proposals, modified by what worked and did not work in our family. In other words, I won a high-conflict child custody battle so thoroughly that the judge in my family’s case ordered my ex-husband to pay 90 percent of my attorney’s fees, but my children and I had to wait years for the case to wind its way through the legal system. This meant that my children were subject to years of coercive control and emotional abuse. I was, too, but I never had to live with my abusive co-parent and his even more abusive second wife. My children did. I won my courtroom battle because I had previously obtained court orders for our family to work with specialized therapists and did what they told me to do. By doing what the therapists told me to do, I healed decades of chronic depression I suffered as a result of my own severe childhood trauma, including generational child sex abuse. Spending money on therapy is much more beneficial than spending money on lawyers. Moreover, not everyone has the money for either lawyers or therapists. We can still promote family and individual well-being and mental health.
People know that military combat leads to trauma, which we now call Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). I am old, so I remember the delayed reckoning with the damage the Vietnam War inflicted on so many young American men, but my parents talked about the shell-shocked soldiers who came back from the front line of World War I and World War II. These men struggled to cope with normal lives after the war and became alcoholics or committed suicide.
Since the reckoning with Vietnam soldiers coming home with PTSD, our society has come to recognize that trauma is also caused by rape and child sex abuse. I know about child sex abuse. When I was four years old, I was sexually abused in a neighbor's basement by two teenage neighbor boys while my mother was so depressed she did not know or care where I was. A few weeks later, she spent a couple of months in a psychiatric hospital. I perceived this loss as her not wanting me as a child. She died of cirrhosis of the liver, emphysema, and congestive heart failure when I was 28. When I was 43, my cousin revealed to me that both our mothers had been sexually abused by our grandfather.
What I went through is now called generational trauma. I lived the consequences. For decades, I struggled with chronic depression, low self-esteem, and anxiety. Fortunately, I learned how to heal trauma by going through more trauma, but this time with the help of therapists…except they were mostly therapists for my children. I followed the therapist’s advice for me as a mother on how to support my children, and ultimately healed myself. Therapy is valuable because therapists learn how to help people struggling with their mental health. Unfortunately, many people can’t afford the therapy they need. Fortunately, you can follow what therapists would advise you to do, such as meditating mindfully and learning a health communication skill called Nonviolent Communication.
I learned about these skills while going through more trauma—my children and I went through an eight-year-long, high-conflict child custody battle between their father and his second wife against me.
The incident that sparked this battle occurred when my son was 10 years old. My children stayed with their father one week in January 2007, when I was on retreat with The Compassionate Listening Project to learn Compassionate Listening. When I arrived home, my son, who is on the high-functioning end of the autism spectrum, told me what happened while I was gone. One day, his stepmother ordered him to look her in the eyes and repeat her criticism of me, his mother, back to her.
“Your mother is nothing but a leech on your father,” she said.
“Stop criticizing my mother,” my son said.
“I have a right to criticize your mother,” she said.
Since asking his stepmother to stop criticizing his mother wasn’t working, my son tried another way to get away from her.
“I’m tired; I need to take a nap,” he said.
“Come sleep on my bed,” said his stepmother, and she made him move to her bed while she continued criticizing me.
Many years later, when my daughter was an adult, she told me about the time her stepmother called her father “stupid” and spent several minutes berating him for missing a turn they needed to take while walking through Montreal, Canada.
Then Stepmom turned to my daughter and said, “Isn’t your father stupid?”
My daughter confided to me that she was afraid her stepmother would start criticizing her if she did not say that her father was stupid, so she said, “Yes, my father is stupid.
If these two incidents were isolated, maybe they would not be so bad, but both my children and I had to endure years of such incidents nearly every week for almost ten years.
Because emotional abuse, now called coercive control, is legal.
My son, who chose to stay with me and was allowed by his therapists to stop visiting his father at age 16, was eventually diagnosed with Irritable Bowel Syndrome
My daughter, who chose to live with her father and whom I rarely saw for 18 months until I won a child custody battle to be able to see her, was eventually diagnosed by three different therapists with Borderline Personality Disorder, which is a serious mental health disorder commonly experienced by survivors of long-term child sex abuse. If serious and prolonged emotional abuse can cause the same mental health problems as serious and prolonged child sex abuse, why is it legal?
If you want to know more about my family’s story and how I won my child custody battle so you can win your battle too, you can buy my book, Losing My Daughter, Finding Myself: A Memoir and Workbook About Healing Childhood Trauma While Winning a Child Custody Battle by V. Jones on Amazon.com.
About fifteen years ago, I founded a very small non-profit called Compassionate Gathering to train Catholics to listen compassionately to clergy abuse survivors. That worked very well with the very few Catholics and clergy abuse survivors who participated. Soon, ordinary child sex abuse survivors came to me for help. Among these survivors, I met three women who lost their children to the men who abused them. They did not have my resources for therapy and lawyers. I know that these women were not alone, so I have been traveling around Oregon giving Domestic Violence agencies copies of my book, as well as visiting county fairs and farmers’ markets while wearing a t-shirt that reads Emotional Abuse (coercive control) is Very Damaging.
During these travels, I asked the domestic violence agencies how many of their clients were involved in high-conflict child custody battles. The Executive Director of The Safe Project in Coos Bay told me she encountered such survivors at least once a week. In Florence, Oregon, at the Siuslaw Outreach Services, the advocates who worked directly with domestic violence survivors told me they encountered survivors struggling with child custody battles more than once a week. In Lake County, Oregon, the domestic violence agency advocates told me they see such cases only about once a month, but they serve a much smaller population. I have also learned that many agencies have been experiencing funding cuts, and some have closed permanently, including those in Curry County and Newport, Oregon.
I have some ideas to address both coercive control and family violence. My son, who works in horticulture but is interested in the legal issues related to child abuse and child custody, is working with me. We want to propose two laws to the Oregon State Legislature
Proposed Legal Definitions of Coercive Control:
Based on House Bill 3186 submitted by State Representative Courtney Neron in 2021, and the South Carolina Senate Bill 588, also named the Mica Miller Law, for the wife of a South Carolina Pastor who was subject to extremely controlling behavior by her husband and who died in April 2024 under suspicious circumstances.
A person exerting coercive control over another engages in a pattern of behaviors, including threatening, humiliating, criticizing, and intimidating actions, designed to exploit another person, including:
- Isolating the other person (which includes spouses, former spouses, romantic partners, care recipients, and children) from friends and family;
- Controlling how much money is accessible to another person and how it is spent;
- Excessively, harshly, or unreasonably criticizing a family member or care recipient.
- Excessively, harshly, or unreasonably criticizing a family member to another family member or friend..
- Monitoring the other person’s activities, communications, and movements.
- Name-calling, degradation, and frequently demeaning the other person.
- Forcing a child or adult to repeat exaggerated or untrue criticisms of another family member.
- Repeatedly and frequently criticizing a co-parent or other family member to a child or other family member or friend.
- Threatening to harm or kill another person.
- (10)Damaging another person’s property.
- (11)Threatening to publish information or make false reports to a law enforcement agency regarding the other person.
- (12)Forcing a person to take part in criminal activity or child abuse.
- (13)Depriving a child or adult of medical care.
- (14)Depriving a child or an adult of sleep.
- (15)Evidence that may be used includes, but is not limited to, text messages, emails, photographs, 911 tapes, bodycam footage, diaries, and bank records.
- (16)Evidence may include testimony from family members and friends, but also testimony from therapists
- (17)In the case of child custody issues, testimony from Court-ordered Parenting Time Coordinators and Family Systems Therapists is preferred to testimony from other therapists.
- (18)In child custody cases, judges should automatically appoint Family Systems Therapists and Parenting Time Coordinators when one or both parents submit a request to court officials.
- (19)Coercive Control can be punished similarly to a Class E Felony in South Carolina Law, which carries a penalty of up to 10 years of imprisonment.
- (20)Coercive Control can also be addressed through civil lawsuits.
- (21)This proposal adds elements for persons subject to parenting plans, such as divorced or never-married parents not living together. These elements are in addition to other elements describing coercive behavior and include activities that interfere with the other parent’s parenting time. Examples of behaviors that interfere with the other parent’s parenting time include arriving two hours late to pick up children for non-emergent or trivial circumstances, holding children inside a home for more than thirty minutes when another parent arrives to pick up children, requesting parenting time changes less than seven days in advance in non-emergent situations, and denying a parent a change in parenting schedule made at least 30 days in advance to take a vacation with children or requesting a vacation with the children, but not actually taking the children on a vacation.
You get the idea
Solutions:
1st Remedy: Lawsuits to Compensate Survivors of Coercive Control
Allow survivors of coercive control abuse experiencing serious mental health issues, and with good documentation, to sue their perpetrators for financial compensation, the way child sex abuse survivors are able to do. This includes any survivor of coercive control, family, or intimate partner violence, not just those who have gone through child custody battles. Then tax both the attorney’s fees and the financial settlements 5%. Use this money to help domestic violence agencies stay open. Favor the rural counties with fewer resources.
2nd Remedy: Teach children, romantic partners, and family members communication skills, including Nonviolent Communication, Mindfulness, or similar skills, as well as listening skills, to help people know how to communicate in a way that promotes family and interpersonal well-being.
First Provision: Prevent Coercive Control/ Emotional Abuse
Our society is already immersed in coercive communications. Go to a political rally and you are likely to hear lots of criticism of a politician’s opponents. To some extent, this is understandable, but for a society and a family to work, there has to be the ability to hear each other and communicate in a way that helps people work together.
Teach Nonviolent Communication, listening skills, and self-calming skills such as mindfulness or nonreligious yoga in every year in school, beginning in kindergarten. A religious school can teach a spiritual practice that has been scientifically validated to heal trauma, rather than mindfulness, such as Centering Prayer or Native American practices, including traditional dancing and sweat lodges. Please note that teaching children these skills doubles as an anti-bullying program.
The goal of this provision is to give people skills so they will not traumatize their romantic partners or children. These skills will also help people perform better in the work world and in school.
Second Provision—Reinforcing skills in families to prevent coercive control/emotional abuse:
All new parents, whether married or unmarried, to take more classes or workshops on Nonviolent communication, listening skills, and a scientifically validated practice to heal trauma
.
Third Provision: Reinforcing skills in separating and divorcing families to prevent coercive control/emotional abuse:
All separating or divorcing parents are required to take more classes or workshops on Nonviolent communication, listening skills, and a scientifically validated practice to heal trauma.
Fourth Provision: Documenting coercive control/emotional abuse:
All separating or divorcing parents will be automatically required to communicate by parenting app or email to provide evidence of coercive control or emotional abuse that is readily observable by governmental or non-profit employees who work with child abuse and domestic violence victims.
Fifth Provision: Examples of Coercive Control
Not allowing a child, parent, other family member, or romantic partner to have contact with their parents, children, other family members, and friends.
Forcing a child, parent, other family member, or romantic partner to criticize someone they love, like, or respect, such as a child, parent, sibling, romantic partner, teacher, friend, or health care personnel
Forcing a child, parent, other family member, or romantic partner to cut off contact with someone they love, like, or respect, such as a parent, sibling, teacher, friend, neighbor, or healthcare personnel.
Isolating a child
Excessive or prolonged criticism or denigration of a child, romantic partner, or friend
Excessive or prolonged criticism or denigration of other family members, romantic partners.
Forcing a teenage girl, parent, other family member, or romantic partner to attend family events when she has menstrual cramps.
Forcing a teenage girl to bleed out when she has her period by not allowing her to have access to a bathroom and menstrual products.
Not allowing a child, parent, other family member, or romantic partner to sleep when they are tired.
Not allowing a child to sleep.
Not allowing a parent or grandparent to sleep.
Not allowing a romantic partner to sleep.
Prolonged and frequent yelling at a child, parent, romantic partner, or friend (More than a minute or two. We are human. On occasion, we slip up and do the wrong thing. Is this a rare slip-up, or is this behavior common or even frequent?
I need help because I am biased by my experiences. Please list examples of coercive control here.
____________________________________________________________________________________
Third Remedy: What to do when coercive control is reported in a family, especially separated and divorced family situations.
The court/county government must take action on these issues automatically, like it would with a case of child sex or physical abuse, or the physical abuse of a domestic or romantic partner. Requiring parents to battle out a problem in court is slow and expensive. Moreover, money is spent on lawyers that would be better spent on therapists and learning therapeutic self-care, communication, and relationship skills.
Can reports be made to both governmental and non-profit agencies that work with domestic violence and child abuse survivors, who then report to a judge?
1st Report: If a parent, step-parent, or romantic partner of a parent forces a child to criticize another family member or do or say something inappropriate, or otherwise emotionally abuses or coercively controls a family member or friend, this can be reported to governmental or non-profit child abuse or domestic violence agencies.
- Take workshops on at least one self-calming skill, including mindfulness, yoga, centering, or contemplative prayer. The agencies can be paid to teach these skills, although people can also choose an approved program from their religion of choice, whether it is a sacred Native American practice, Buddhist Meditation, Hindu yoga, or Christian Centering Prayer.
- Take a workshop on Nonviolent Communication that may be provided by a school, domestic violence, or child abuse non-profit, or governmental agency.
- Take a workshop on how to listen.
- Parents will automatically be required to communicate through the parent app or email. These emails or app messages can be governmental or child abuse professions
Second Report in divorced or separated families: Family members and romantic partners should be required to attend family systems therapy with their children or other family members. The therapist will report to a court official, governmental, or non-profit agency what they observe.
Family systems therapy strongly supports family connections, but a parent or partner who is manipulative will eventually reveal themselves. My experience is that I differentiated myself from my ex-husband and his second wife by faithfully attending therapy, following the therapist’s advice, and being respectful of their knowledge and experience when I disagreed with them.
Third Report in divorced or separated families: If emotional abuse (coercive control) remains a problem in a family or domestic partner relationship involving coercive control of children and partners, the parent who engages most frequently will lose parenting time with children. Child support will be adjusted accordingly. Changes in parenting time may be from 50/50 shared parenting to every other weekend or three overnights and days every other week for the parent most responsible for problems. Child support will be adjusted accordingly.
Fourth Report in divorced or separated families: if emotional abuse (coercive control) remains a problem in a family or domestic partner relationship involving coercive control of children and partners, the parent who engages most frequently will lose parenting time with children. Child support will be adjusted accordingly. Changes in parenting time may be to two days every other week for the parent most responsible for problems. Child support will be adjusted accordingly.
Fifth Report in divorced or separated families: If coercive control continues, the abusive parent may have one day (no nights) of parenting time every other week.) Child support will be adjusted accordingly.
Sixth Report in divorced or separated families: The abusive parent will not see children outside of family systems therapy. Child support will be adjusted accordingly